BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Kings Crescent - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Kings Crescent
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://kingscrescent.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Kings Crescent
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20250918T193000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20250918T210000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20250617T103250Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251005T143232Z
UID:3142-1758223800-1758229200@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:ETRA meeting (housing issues) 18 September 2025
DESCRIPTION:KC ETRA Meeting\n(Enhanced Tenants & Residents Association Meeting)\nThursday 18 September 2025\n7:30 – 9.00 pm\nHackney Showroom\n  \nMinutes\n  \n18 September 2025 7.30 – 9pm \n‘Enhanced’ Tenants & Residents Association Meeting \n1. Welcome\, Introductions & Apologies\nLead: Remi (TRA Chair) \nPresent:\nTRA members – Remi (Chair)\, Emley\, Richard\, Isadora\, Kathy\, Jill\, Sarah\nHackney – June Welcome (Housing Officer KCE)\, Josephine Burton (Homeownership Team)\, Laura Coombs\, Bernard Thomas (Cleaning)\, John Prestage (Repairs)\, Cllr. Clare Potter\nApologies: Bianca Rembrandt (ASB) \n\nMinutes from the last meeting (22 May 2025) were approved.\n\nKathy McEwan: \n\nEmphasised the need for more resident support to keep TRA activities running.\nHighlighted the voluntary nature of TRA roles (not paid\, no financial benefit).\nTRA aims to build a stronger community through initiatives such as allotments and youth club.\nUrged members to help set TRA priorities for the next year – residents to bring ideas to the AGM in October.\nTRA needs new committee members and volunteers for: communications\, newsletter\, funding applications\, strategy\, youth club\, gardening\, website\, treasurer\, administration\, secretary\, and Hackney liaison.\nGardening and youth club will continue\, but succession planning is required.\n\nRichard McVetis: \n\nOutlined rules of engagement for meetings: respectful communication\, focus on agenda items\, no interruptions\, concise contributions.\n\nAction Points: \n\nResidents to think about and suggest TRA priorities before the October AGM.\nTRA to circulate a volunteer call-out with specific roles listed.\n\n  \n  \n2. Estate Cleaning\nLead: Bernard Thomas (Hackney Cleaning Team) \nDiscussion: \n\nPersistent issues: urine in blocks (Bramfield\, Theobold)\, pigeon droppings\, dirty corridors\, uncollected recycling\, and external rubbish dumping.\nResidents reported cleaning issues being unresolved for weeks/months despite being logged.\nConcerns raised that service charges increase annually\, but cleaning standards remain low.\nQuery on accountability: who checks standards and ensures cleaning has been completed?\n\nBernard (Council): \n\nExplained cleaners’ duties: lifts\, entrances\, bin areas\, litter collection.\nDeep/“spot” clean every 20 days.\nAdmitted problems with ASB occurring after cleaning which delays resolution.\nCleaning regime to change – two cleaners will now work together.\nCleaning Charter available on Hackney website: https://hackney.gov.uk/estate-cleaning\n\nResidents: \n\nBramfield Court corridor reportedly not cleaned for months.\nStandards feel subjective – need agreed baseline.\nSpecific pigeon issue: allotment gate and Wallington Court exterior access corridor heavily affected by droppings.\n\nJune (Housing Officer): \n\nWill share her estate inspection schedule with TRA.\nInvited residents to join inspections.\n\nAction Points: \n\nBernard & June to conduct a joint walk-around with TRA to set agreed baseline standards.\nJune to circulate her inspection schedule to TRA members.\nBernard to investigate pigeon issues and request pigeon spikes installation (allotment gate\, Wallington Court).\nResidents to continue reporting cleaning issues via estate cleaning email address (Hackney).\nTRA to monitor changes following new two-cleaner regime.\n\n  \n  \n\n\n Repairs\n\n\nLead: John Prestage (Hackney Repairs) \nAgenda Items & Discussion: \n\nLighting – Theobalds Court/ Flooded Area – Old Boiler Room\n\nJohn confirmed he could not comment on lighting issues (he is carpenter background and not electrician).\nRepairs system described as fragmented\, emailing without a reference number or date risks requests being deleted.\nResident raised issue of a huge leak. Leak was fixed\, but the repair left a large hole.\nConcern: repairs often leave incomplete or poor-quality outcomes.\n\n\nBroken Courtyard Gates\n\nOngoing frustration with repeated issues not being resolved effectively.\n\n\nCommunication & Oversight\n\nResidents questioned: Who decides on the work? Who checks it has been carried out to standard?\nRepairs system seen as “not fit for purpose” – siloed departments\, no clear accountability.\nCall centre staff often lack training and knowledge of estate complexities.\nStrong concerns about value for money in service charges given repeated\, unresolved repairs.\n\n\nCouncillor Input\n\nCllr. Clare Potter asked that all repair issues be sent to her directly by residents.\nResidents suggested escalating concerns to the Housing Ombudsman.\n\n\n\nResidents’ Requests: \n\nOPTs time planner to attend next meeting.\nRon Springer (Hackney Repairs) to be invited to attend.\nMore training for Hackney call centre staff.\nDedicated repairs overseer needed with full estate oversight.\n\nAction Points: \n\nTRA to formally request OPTs (Manager at call centre) time planner’s attendance at the next meeting.\nTRA to invite Ron Springer (Hackney Repairs) to next meeting.\nResidents to feed ongoing repair issues to Cllr. Clare Potter for escalation.\nTRA to draft a letter to Hackney Council requesting:\n\nclearer accountability and supervision of repairs\,\nimproved call centre training\,\ndedicated estate-wide repairs oversight.\n\n\nConsider escalation to Housing Ombudsman if systemic issues persist.\n\n\n4. Lifts\nLead: Cindy Crawford (Interim Lift Service Manager)\n(Unable to attend – written responses promised. Presentation given by resident Karsten Hartmann.) \nDiscussion: \n\nPresentation & Report\n\nKarsten Hartmann gave an overview of the lift maintenance report\, stepping in due to council officer absence.\nThanks were extended to Karsten for undertaking this work on behalf of residents\, effectively doing the council’s job.\nEmley to circulate Karsten’s report to residents via email and WhatsApp.\n\n\nPersistent Failures & Design Issues\n\nResidents highlighted that Hackney Council has failed to address the root causes of repeated lift breakdowns.\nDesign faults were identified in earlier meetings but remain unresolved\, raising serious questions about whether newer block lifts are still under warranty and if design flaws are being properly addressed.\nResidents noted that the same issues have persisted for years despite repeated reporting.\n\n\nHealth & Safety Risks\n\nAlarm buttons in lifts frequently fail to work.\nThere is no reliable mobile signal or emergency phone coverage inside lifts.\nResidents reported women and babies trapped in lifts for hours without being able to call for help – a critical health and safety hazard.\nCurrent failures represent not only an inconvenience but a significant risk to life and wellbeing\, particularly for vulnerable residents.\n\n\nAccountability & Oversight\n\nNo evidence of a proper monitoring system or accountability structure to ensure repairs and servicing are carried out effectively.\nResidents expressed frustration that they are forced to act as investigators and monitors\, effectively doing the work of Hackney Council\, while still facing increasing service charges and declining service levels.\nThe absence of the Lift Service Manager (Cindy Crawford) was seen as unacceptable given the seriousness of these ongoing issues.\n\n\nEscalation\n\nCouncillor Clare Potter to be sent the full lift maintenance report and resident accounts.\nResidents raised the possibility of escalating matters to external regulators due to consistent failures in safety and service.\n\n\n\nAction Points: \n\nEmley to circulate Karsten’s lift maintenance report to all residents (email and WhatsApp).\nCindy Crawford (Lift Service Manager) to provide written responses to all lift-related questions (maintenance\, design\, warranty\, accountability).\nTRA to request confirmation of whether lifts in newer blocks remain under warranty.\nHackney Council to clarify:\n\nWho is currently responsible for lift management and oversight.\nWhat actions are being taken to address acknowledged design faults.\nTimelines for resolving alarm and emergency coverage failures.\n\n\nTRA to prepare a formal letter highlighting lifts as a serious health & safety risk requiring urgent intervention.\nCouncillor Clare Potter to receive the full report and resident testimonies for escalation within Hackney Council.\nTRA to consider escalation to the Health & Safety Executive (HSE) and/or the Housing Ombudsman if immediate and verifiable improvements are not made.\n\n  \n5. Homeownership & Service Charges\nLeads: Josephine Burton & Laura Coombs (Hackney Homeownership Team) \nDiscussion: \n\nRole of the Homeownership Team\n\nJosephine and Laura introduced themselves\, explained their roles\, and invited resident questions.\nStated that residents can dispute service charges\, but this requires very specific detail and supporting evidence\, which many residents find burdensome.\n\n\nNature of Service Charges\n\nClarified that Hackney’s service charge is not for “service provided” as residents might expect\, but rather a contribution towards the costs of works\, utilities\, and services (e.g. building insurance\, cleaning\, maintenance\, management fees).\nResidents challenged the fairness of rising charges given falling service standards.\n\n\nAccountability & Oversight\n\nResidents expressed frustration at the lack of transparency or accountability over how charges are calculated and monitored.\nManagement fees were highlighted – residents asked how these are calculated. The team confirmed details are on Hackney’s website: https://hackney.gov.uk/service-charges.\nHomeownership officers admitted they interact with many different council teams but do not always have the power to intervene directly. They agreed to feedback frustrations and issues.\n\n\nStructural Changes\n\nA new Head of Service role has been created to focus on resolving systemic problems.\nThe team acknowledged that current systems are inadequate and that past failings were unacceptable.\nNew IT systems are being developed to provide more accurate costings\, pricing\, and transparency (particularly around reserve funds and future works).\n\n\nSpecific Issues Raised by Residents\n\nLifts: Residents were told that obvious lift-related costs may not automatically be passed on to service charges\, depending on circumstances.\nCCTV: Residents questioned why they were still paying charges for CCTV when it had not been functioning.\nReserve Fund:\n\nResidents asked how much was being held in the reserve fund for their specific flats/blocks.\nOfficers assured residents that the money exists but admitted they could not currently provide figures for individual buildings.\nNew IT systems are expected to resolve this\, but no timeline was given.\nConcern: historically the council did not operate reserve funds for Right-to-Buy leaseholders. Current reserve fund arrangements are presented as a “USP” (unique selling point)\, but residents remain unconvinced.\nReserve fund intended for major works (e.g. door replacement\, roofs\, lifts) but has not yet been utilised.\nResidents expressed strong concern about the lack of financial systems\, data gaps\, and future planning (e.g. for major works expected around 2030).\n\n\nConsultation & Engagement:\n\nResidents frustrated that they have not been consulted on system changes or restructuring.\nQuestioned how improvements can be designed without resident input.\nNoted that the Homeownership team does not always hear about issues raised at TRA meetings.\n\n\nComplaints Procedure\n\nTeam reminded residents to use Hackney’s three-stage complaints system.\nResidents responded that the complaints process often feels like a closed loop with no accountability or joined-up thinking\, leaving them powerless.\n\n\n\n\n\nAction Points: \n\nHomeownership team to feed residents’ frustrations and concerns back to senior management.\nJosephine & Laura to confirm when the new IT systems will provide transparent reserve fund data by block/estate.\nHackney Council to clarify:\n\nhow management fees are calculated and justified\,\nhow reserve fund contributions are held\, tracked\, and reported to leaseholders\,\nhow residents will be consulted in restructuring/improvement processes.\n\n\nTRA to draft formal request for reserve fund statements by building/flat\, with a clear timeline for delivery.\nTRA to escalate systemic concerns about lack of accountability to the Head of Service and consider raising with the Housing Ombudsman.\nCouncillor Clare Potter to receive a summary of resident concerns for follow-up.\n\n  \n6. Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB)\nLead: Bianca Rembrandt (ASB Officer – Apologies sent) \nDiscussion: \n\nNoise Complaints\n\nOngoing concerns about noise disturbance from residents and events.\nSpecific mention of street parties continuing beyond permitted times\, creating disruption and distress.\n\n\nCriminal Activity\n\nResidents reminded that criminal activity must be reported directly to the police.\nNext Police Safer Neighbourhoods meeting:\nSt John’s Church\n15 October\n7pm\nResidents strongly encouraged to attend and raise issues directly with police.\n\n\nRespect & Conduct\n\nChair reported receiving unfair treatment and personal attacks\, including during discussions around ASB and noise.\nMeeting reiterated that TRA operates on a voluntary basis\, and respectful behaviour is essential.\nResidents were reminded that living in a community requires mutual respect and consideration for neighbours.\n\n\n\nAction Points: \n\nResidents to raise specific ASB and criminal activity concerns directly with the police at the 15 October meeting.\nBianca Rembrandt to follow up with TRA on unresolved ASB cases at next meeting.\nTRA to restate rules of engagement at the start of future meetings to prevent personal attacks on volunteers.\nExplore possibility of joint estate walkabouts with ASB officer and Housing Officer to monitor persistent problem areas.\n\n  \n7. Any Other Business\n\nBikes in the Lock-Up\n\nIssue raised regarding abandoned or unclaimed bicycles in the estate lock-up areas.\nJune (Housing Officer) will develop a plan to address this\, including:\n\nIdentifying and tagging bikes to determine ownership.\nSetting a timeline for residents to claim their bikes.\nArranging removal of abandoned bicycles.\n\n\nResidents were asked to allow June time to gain a full overview of the estate and its challenges\, as she is newly in post.\nJune emphasised her commitment to effecting positive change on the estate but noted this will require both time and resident support.\n\n\n\nAction Points: \n\nJune to prepare and circulate a clear plan for dealing with bikes in the lock-ups (including process\, timeline\, and communication to residents).\nTRA to support June by encouraging residents to engage with the identification/claiming process.\nReview progress at the next TRA meeting.\n\n  \n  \n  \n  \nPrevious Information prior to meeting:\nETRA meetings are where residents can speak to Hackney officers about estate issues \nWhat should we bring to the Council’s attention?\nAs your Tenants and Residents Association (TRA)\, we are responsible for setting the agenda and inviting the relevant council departments. \nSo far\, we’re planning to raise the following key issues \n* Pest control (mice\, rats\, mosquitoes)\n* Lifts (maintenance and reliability)\n* Cleaning (internal and external areas)\n* Gardening (green space maintenance)\n* Parking (use and enforcement across the estate) \nPlease let us know urgently if you have additional agenda items to add (email KingsCrescentN4@gmail.com) \nThe deadline for adding issues to the agenda is Monday 18 August to allow us time to invite the relevant Hackney representatives. \nPlease ensure any housing/estate issues you are raising have been reported to Hackney directly. \nYou can find details of relevant Hackney departments on the ESTATE page of this website \n  \nUpdate (28.08.2025):\nWe are still working on the agenda as we have not had confirmation from Hackney teams regarding who will be attending. \nIn attendace so far will be June Welcome the Estate Manager\, and someone from Leasehold/Service Charges team. \nPlus we will discuss ASB/community safety. \n  \nIssues raised with other specific departments but no reply yet: \nRepairs team:\n\n\nSome specific concerns are: \n\nLifts – Maintenance and reliability. Ongoing issues with repeated breakdowns\, why is this happening? Is anyone looking into cause of these? Response times to breakdowns have improved but they do keep happening. Would it be possible for you to get a report of all of the breakdowns reported on Kings Crescent over the past 5 years? Who (if anyone) checks on the quality of repairs done if there are repeated issues?\nLift alarm buttons – residents reported previously that life emergency alarms were not working\, have these been assessed and are they all working now? (Many lifs in the newer blocks have no mobile reception so there is no way to let someone know they are trapped in a lift without the alarm button!). (Just to add there have been breakdowns since I sent the email and the lift alarm buttons did not work)\nLighting in Theobalds Court corridors have been broken for 3 years now. People come to ‘fix it’ but it remains broken. What can be done about this and why do issues go unresolved like this for so long? (Lights work but come on during the day and not at night).\nFlooded area at base of Theobalds Court – the old boiler room is flooded. This has been drained a few times but just floods again\, can a long term solution be achieved to stop this happening? This may be impacting the lighting issue and issue residents are having with mosquitos.\n\nCleaning\n\n\nSome of the specific issues are:\n\n\nUrine in blocks not being cleaned for several weeks (Theobald Court) despite residents and June our Estate Manager reporting this\nGeneral standards of cleaning in many of the older blocks and some of the newer blocks\nHow often do deep cleans take place? According to the website it states:  “We deep clean blocks on a priority basis\, based on the overall condition of the building itself\, with ceilings\, floors and walls receiving a thorough deep clean. We deliver block cleaning to meet the British Institute of Cleaning Science cleaning standards.” I have only seen this happen once in 13 years in Bramfield\, so I’m wondering what the criteria actually is.\nWho is responsible for cleaning outside blocks? For example lights covered in spider webs and dust\, pigeon poo in communal areas etc that have been like that for years.\nThe cost of cleaning increases on service charges year on year but the standard still seems low\, how is this justified and who checks that cleaning has been done?\n\nPest Issues:\n\n\nSpecifically the pest issues are mice/rats in the buildings and getting into flats via communal areas such as pipes\, mosquitoes potentially breeding under balcony flooring\, and pigeons nesting on balconies. \n\nKings Crescent buildings have a mixed tenure with some council tenants\, come leaseholders and some shared ownership properties\, but the issues are affecting residents across all tenures. So we would like to discuss the concerns with an expert from your team to know how this should be approached.\n\n\n\nOther issues that have been raised: \n\nPainting programme – As Hackney says\, “we will base our planned painting programme for properties on an eight-year cycle\, subject to review and survey.” Can we get an update on when the next repainting cycle is planned?\nMonthly inspections – How can we be kept informed about what’s being identified and reviewed for fixing during the monthly inspections? There are many issues around the estate (broken gates\, exposed screws\, dirt\, poor cleaning)\, and we need clear communication so residents know what’s being detected and addressed.\nBike storage – There are lots of unused bikes taking up space for years\, occupying spots that heavier or frequently used bikes could use. What’s the plan to ask residents to donate/sell unused bikes\, or at least move them to areas where they won’t block those who cycle daily?\n\nSee HERE for all of the previous meeting minutes
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/etra-meeting-18-september-2025/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:ETRA meeting
ORGANIZER;CN="KC TRA Committee":MAILTO:kingscrescentn4@gmail.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20251015T190000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20251015T203000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20250828T174524Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251015T213151Z
UID:3166-1760554800-1760560200@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:Police meeting 15 October 2025 7pm
DESCRIPTION:  \nBrownswood ward panel meeting will be on\nWednesday 15th October 2025 at 7pm \nat St John the Evangelist Church N4 2LW\n  \nAt these meetings the local police and Hackney Community Safety team are available to discuss concerns with residents \nSt John’s Church is on the corner of Queen’s Drive and Gloucester Drive \n  \n\nMET Engage\n\nIf you are not aware the police have a new type of media called MET Engage which is designed to enhance community crime fighting and increase the flow of information and concerns from local residents and businesses so they can be logged and addressed.  Please see the link below for more information but the police will be able to explain more about this at the Ward panel meeting.\nhttps://www.metengage.co.uk
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/police-meeting-15-october-2025-7pm/
LOCATION:St John the Evangelist Church\, Queens Drive\, N4 2LW
CATEGORIES:police ward panel meeting
ORGANIZER;CN="Police - Brownswood SNT":MAILTO:Brownswood.SNT@met.police.uk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20251015T190000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20251015T213000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20250807T132703Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250828T173048Z
UID:3147-1760554800-1760563800@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:** POSTPONED** AGM & Social Event 15 October 2025
DESCRIPTION:**POSTPONED**\nThis date clashed with the police meeting so has been moved to the following week – 22 October 2025 \n15 October 2025 AGM & Social Event\n 7.30-9.00pm\nVenue: Hackney Showroom space\, 4 Murrain Road\, N4 2BN\nIf you live in Kings Crescent\, you are a member of the resident’s association\nand are warmly invited to all Tenants & Resident Association events\nAGM\nThis meeting will start with the ‘Annual General Meeting’ (AGM) where the new resident’s group committee will be voted in. \n***Mew committee members really welcome! Please get in touch if you’re interested in joining the TRA committee*** \nEveryone living on Kings Crescent Estate is automatically a member of the TRA and a committee of residents is elected at the AGM to lead the group. \nAll KC TRA committee members contribute their time and skills on a voluntary basis. \nIf you are interested in joining the committee please email KingsCrescentN4@gmail.com \n  \nThe AGM will only take about 20 minutes so we are thinking of combining it with a social event to facilitate residents to get to know each other \nDetails to be confirmed but initial thoughts are: \n\nKids cinema 7-8.30pm in studio space to allow families to attend\nAGM 7.30-8pm in the big space\nQuiz 8-8.30pm then general social time in the big space\nBingo at 8.30pm in the studio space\nEvent end time can be flexible\n\nWe are open to suggestions and anyone volunteering their time/skills/enthusiams to the event!!!! \nGet in touch if you have any ideas: KingsCrescentN4@gmail.com
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/agm-and-social/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:community event
ORGANIZER;CN="KC TRA Committee":MAILTO:kingscrescentn4@gmail.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20251022T190000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20251022T213000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20250828T173652Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251021T212050Z
UID:3164-1761159600-1761168600@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:AGM & Social Event 22 October 2025
DESCRIPTION:22 October 2025 AGM & Social Event\n7.30-9.00pm\nVenue: Hackney Showroom space\, 4 Murrain Road\, N4 2BN\nIf you live in Kings Crescent\, you are a member of the resident’s association\nand are warmly invited to all Tenants & Resident Association events\n\nAGM\nThe ‘Annual General Meeting’ (AGM) is where the new resident’s group committee will be voted in. \n***New committee members really welcome! Please get in touch if you’re interested in joining the TRA committee*** \nEveryone living on Kings Crescent Estate is automatically a member of the TRA and a committee of residents is elected at the AGM to lead the group. \nAll KC TRA committee members contribute their time and skills on a voluntary basis. \nIf you are interested in joining the committee please email KingsCrescentN4@gmail.com \nAgenda\, Chair’s report & Treasurer report here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Gs1_MjVKVclRzyxAW90mfYbxL9Klo7UX?usp=sharing \n  \nSocial Event\nThe AGM will only take about 25 minutes so we are combining it with a social event to facilitate residents to get to know each other \nGet in touch if you have any questions or ideas: KingsCrescentN4@gmail.com \n  \nWe will be showing the new Lilo & Stitch movie for the kids and there will be free glitter tattoos\, pizza and snacks.\nFor the adults there will be pizza and bingo. Soft drinks will be provided but please bring your own alcohol if you would like to drink.
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/agm-social-event-22-october-2025/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:residents group meeting
ORGANIZER;CN="KC TRA Committee":MAILTO:kingscrescentn4@gmail.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20251023T190000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20251023T203000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20251125T133938Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251125T133938Z
UID:3239-1761246000-1761251400@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:RSG 23 Oct 2025
DESCRIPTION:Resident Steering Group‘ meetings happen every few months. \nKings Crescent residents can apply to be in the RSG and it is a chance to meet with Hackney’s Regeneration Team\, architects\, builders etc to discuss the plans for the next round of new buildings and refurbishment of existing blocks on the South of Kings Crescent Estate \n  \nNotes of Kings Crescent Steering Group Meeting held on 23rd October 2025  \n  \n  \n\n\n\nPresent:\nCllr Clare Potter (CP) (Chair) – late \nPaul Cushion (PC) (Theobalds Court) \nKarsten Hartman (KH) (Wallington Court) \n \nKathy MacEwan (KM) (Kimpton Court) \nPatricia Sim (Theobalds Court) \nEmley Pine (EP) (Bramfield Court) \n  \n \n\n\nIn Attendance:\nRon Greenwood (RG) \nCarol Squires (CS) \nMenekse Saitoglu \nJohn Morris  (minutes) \nLee Walsh (LW) \nTom Roberts (TR)\nLB Hackney \nSource Partnership (ITLA) \nSource Partnership (ITLA) \nSource Partnership (ITLA) \nMulalley \nHHB Architects \n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n1.0\nIntroductions and apologies \nAction\n\n\n \nApologies were received from Peter Douglas\, Rowena Scarborough\, Ellie Virk. Cllr Potter gave advanced notice that she would be late. \nCS chaired the meeting in Cllr Potter’s absence.\n  \n \n\n\n2.0\nNotes of previous meeting held 9th July 2025 and any Matters Arising not elsewhere on the agenda\n \n\n\n  \n \nOne correction to the last minutes: item 4.1\, Jane Kaye should be Joanna Kaye\, Mulalley RLO. \nThe rest of the minutes were agreed.\n  \n \n\n\n3.0\nProject update – Lee Walsh\n \n\n\n3.1 \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n3.2 \n  \n \nLW gave an update on Mulalley’s activities since the last meeting and proposed timings for future events. Presentation slides are attached with these minutes. \n●      S73 planning application due to be submitted Nov 2025. This seeks approval of the changes made to the original\, consented application from 2021. Outcome of this expected March 2026. It is hoped that the process of seeking approval from the Building Safety Regulator will conclude in Sept 2026. Mulalley hope to be able to start on site Oct 2026. \n●      Some live services are still being uncovered. \n●      Sewer diversion works along Casbeard St will start early in the new year and last approx. 12 weeks. Casbeard St will be closed to traffic but the footpath retained\, protected by Heras fencing. \n●      Ground remediation will continue until Spring 2026. \n●      Site investigations will continue until Aug/Sept 2026 to align with anticipated Building Safety Regulator approval around the same time. \n●      LW illustrated façade investigation locations on the slides. Scaffolding will be erected at these points.  The intention is to start and complete the investigations between November and December. \n●      Joanne\, the RLO’s role was explained. (See slide). \n●      Communications: monthly newsletters will be established\, supplemented by bulletins on specific issues. The Comms. portal will be set up once building work starts on site. In the meantime\, LW suggested a work group with residents and relevant Mulalley staff to tailor comms for this particular scheme. \n  \nQuestions/comments \n  \nEP – can we share Joanna’s number with residents? \nLW – yes. \n  \nEP – will sewer diversion works affect the trees at the end of Murrain Rd? \nLW – not the trees but some street furniture might have to be relocated \n  \nKH – will the road be renewed after the diversion works are completed? \nLW – it will be repaired and properly resurfaced at the end of the construction works \n  \nKM – what is the current approach to Social Value? It would be good to hear from Julian’s successor and get a sense of what resources might be available from the SV team at this stage. \nLW – Amber\, in the Social Value team is available and Julian’s successor as Head of Social Value\, Christina Byrne will introduce herself very soon. A budget has been allocated for all 3 schemes in Hackney that Mulalley are working on\, with Kings Crescent benefitting from the majority of it. LW and Christina will meet to agree what is left from the current SV allocation\, pre construction phase. \n  \nKM felt that there should be some support left in the budget for the garden project\, from Julian Sanz’s time. \nLW suggested that Kathy email him with her/the TRA’s assumptions to prompt him to discuss with Head of SV. \n  \nEP – is there still money available to fund youth workers? Remi (TRA Chair) has asked if this can be extended pending the outcome of a National Lottery application. \nLW wished to make it clear that there was never a commitment to fund these roles. The support provided was to pay for a shortfall temporarily following a previous unsuccessful external funding bid.\n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nKathy to email Lee \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \n\n\n4.0\nOverview of S73 planning application – Tom Roberts\n \n\n\n4.1 \n  \n  \n4.2 \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \nTR gave a comprehensive presentation on all aspects of design and other elements of the Section 73 application that seeks approval for the parts of the scheme amended since the original application. Presentation slides accompany these minutes. There were also brick sample boards available in the meeting room. \n  \nQuestions/comments \n  \nKH – can TR confirm that heights of blocks hasn’t changed? \nTR – no heights have changed but there have been some increases in roof parapets (of approx. 0.5 of a metre) to keep maintenance workers on the roofs safe. \n  \nCS – is there an impact on room sizes following reconfigurations? \nTR – some rooms have been redesigned to create new layouts for fire separation \n  \nPC – have flats been made smaller to allow for 2nd staircases? \nTR – Some 2 beds have become 1 beds. Minimum size of 70sq m for a 2 bed has been retained. \nRG confirmed that the scheme is still viable even though there are some different sized flats. The overall number of homes is the same. \n  \nEP queried the dark brick on the external elevations of DZ4. She believes it will feel oppressive. Currently the sunlight bounces off the light coloured brickwork of phase 1 blocks. Could we ask that a survey is carried out of residents’ perceptions and preferences on the brick colour? \nTR – we feel that it will not be as dark as feared. \nKH asked if the choice of brick is a cost issue. \nRG confirmed not. \nKH – light coloured brick can look beautiful. \nKM – while a dark brick looks good on some buildings\, it does seem that a lighter brick would work better here. Could we visit some developments where the proposed type of brick has been used? \nCS suggested taking this issue away from this meeting and Source will carry out a simple poll of potentially affected residents to gauge views while the idea of a lighter brick colour is being reviewed by HHb\, Mulalley and LBH \n  \nEP – how tall will the new buildings be? \nTR – DZ4 will be 6 stories high. No additional stories have been added. \n  \nKM asked if a more detailed impression of what it would be like to walk around a new block could be produced. \nKH – Kimpton and Wallington Ct residents will be facing the tallest building so it would be good to get a better sense of how this would feel. \nTR – there will be a model but it won’t show brick colours. \n  \nBalconies \nPC – re south side new balconies; will they have solid floors? \nTR – yes\, they have to be solid. \n  \n  \n  \nLandscaping/public realm \nEP raised the issues that there have been with the Murrain Rd play equipment; residents wouldn’t want these replicated in the new courtyards. Equipment needs to be able to be maintained by the management team after completion. \nTR – LBH have hopefully learnt lessons from phase 1&2 play arrangements. RG confirmed this. TR will check back with MUF what current thinking is on play equipment. \n  \nEP – will sound from the new courtyards be similar to existing behind new blocks? Is there a way the sound from play can be mitigated? \nTR – the nw courtyards will be bigger\, more open and MUF have designed in trees that should dampen down noise. \n  \nKM – leading on from Dinah Bornat’s work\, has there been enough consideration given to the way children navigate their way safely around the estate and between play spaces? There will still be vehicles moving round the estate\, drawings still show vehicle routes. Bikes deliveries speed through. Could routes be designed so they read less like roads? PC added that bikes and e scooters can be dangerous when driving through; the play street needs better segregation from this. \nTR acknowledged there is a conflict between ‘doorstep play’ and children’s ability to move around and make noise. \nCS suggested picking these items up at the exhibition\, provisionally organised for 2nd December. \n  \nCP asked whether the planning application will be considered by the Planning Committee or by delegated authority to officers. \nRG – delegated unless there are material objections. \n \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nSource  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nTom to speak to MUF re play facilities \n\n\n5.0\nITLA update – Source\n \n\n\n5.1\nCS – Source have continued to hold monthly drop ins during the summer. The MUGA consultation has been a key topic over these months. \n  \nWe have also circulated some revised terms of reference for the steering group and JM asked members\, by email what motivates them to attend meetings and to invite suggestions on how the group can play a more active role in the development proposals. JM summarised the responses – most who answered said they came to RSG meetings to keep informed of current progress and for updates. It was also apparent that we need to be clearer with residents on what they can influence and what is presented to them as information. The quality of the consultation material was also raised and the presentations tonight have been an improvement\, particularly in terms of ‘readability’ on the screen. \n  \nCS – we also looked at what could usefully be a regular agenda item. \nCP\, reflecting previous discussion\, suggested Social Value. \n  \nEP – at TRA meetings we try to ask residents what they want\, so it would be useful to know what money might be available and when. \nLW reminded the meeting that their Social Value budget has to be spread across 3 estates and this budget in the pre-construction phase is limited. It will be larger when construction starts. Mulalley would like to see a ‘shopping list’ of suggestions that doesn’t just funnel all the money to youth activities. He repeated that a working group of residents and Mulalley staff could start to address some of these issues. KM endorsed this approach as a way of keeping the TRA involved and valued. \n  \nCS suggested deferring further discussion on the group’s terms of reference but adding Social Value as a regular agenda item. CP suggested further discussions on our approach to the governance of the RSG could take place at the next partnership meeting which is the regular meeting between CP\, Source and LBH officers. \n \n \n\n\n6.0\nAny other business  \n \n\n\n6.\nThere was no further business\n \n\n\n7.0 \nDate of next meeting  \n \n \n\n\n7.1\nCS suggested 21st January and 25th March 2026 with the exhibition for all residents taking place on 2nd December. \n \n \n\n\n\n  \nA copy of the minutes and the accompanying presentation slides from Mulally can be found HERE
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/rsg-23-oct-2025/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:steering group meeting
ORGANIZER;CN="Source Partnership":MAILTO:john@sourcepartnership.com; carol@sourcepartnership.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20251129T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20251129T180000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20251029T094312Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251117T135054Z
UID:3198-1764424800-1764439200@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:Winter Market 2025
DESCRIPTION:  \nKings Crescent Winter Market\nFollowing the success of previous Winter Markets we are doing it again! \nYou can do some shopping\, consume delicious food & drinks\, there will be glitter tattoos\, crafts and activities for the kids\, and even a visit from Santa!! \nSign up here if you’d like to have a stall: https://forms.gle/x8XAgiLRntvERJCW6 \nThe Residents Association (TRA) will be available at the market to chat to residents and hear ideas that you may have for future events and activities etc  \n 
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/winter-market-2025/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:community event
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://kingscrescent.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Christmas-image.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="KC TRA Committee":MAILTO:kingscrescentn4@gmail.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20251202T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20251202T190000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20251125T121017Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251125T121017Z
UID:3218-1764687600-1764702000@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:Estate Regeneration Public Event
DESCRIPTION:  \n \n  \nSee here for more information and history of the project: https://hackney.gov.uk/kings-crescent-estate
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/estate-regeneration-public-event/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:consultation event
ORGANIZER;CN="Source Partnership":MAILTO:john@sourcepartnership.com; carol@sourcepartnership.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260120T190000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260120T203000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20260407T215147Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260407T215147Z
UID:3261-1768935600-1768941000@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:KC RSG 20 Jan 2026
DESCRIPTION:Notes of Kings Crescent Steering Group Meeting held on 20th January 2026  \n  \n  \n\n\n\nPresent:\nCllr Clare Potter (CP) (Chair) \nResidents: \nPC\, KM\, EP\, PD\n  \n \n\n\nIn Attendance:\nRon Greenwood (RG) \nJoe Stancer (JS) \nCarol Squires (CS) \nMenekse Saitoglu (MS) \nJohn Morris (JM) (minutes) \nLee Walsh (LW) \n \nLB Hackney \nLB Hackney \nSource Partnership (ITLA) \nSource Partnership (ITLA) \nSource Partnership (ITLA) \nMulalley \n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n1.0\nIntroductions and apologies \nAction\n\n\n \nApologies were received from Jill Walker-Murrain\, Ellie Virk\, Karsten Hartman\, Ewan Stone\, Alfred Fiorentini\, Gouri Ghosh.\n  \n \n\n\n2.0\nNotes of previous meeting held 23rd October 2025 and any Matters Arising not elsewhere on the agenda\n \n\n\n  \n \nOne action on page 4 of the previous minutes remains: Tom to speak to MUF re play facilities . LW to remind Tom (Roberts of HHB).  The rest of the minutes were agreed.\n  \nLW\n\n\n3.0\nProject update – Lee Walsh\n \n\n\n3.1 \n  \n3.2 \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \nLW gave an update on Mulalley’s activities since the last meeting and proposed timings for future events. Presentation slides are attached with these minutes. \n  \nQuestions/comments \n  \nEP noted that the hoarding for DZ6S seemed to be going up. RG confirmed struts are in place. LW to further investigate this. \n  \nKM raised the concerns that may be expressed at the loss of the play street for 3 months. LW clarified that there will not be a loss of space but that there needs to be temporary access from Green Lanes provided for emergency vehicles as a result of the sewer diversion works.  CP noted concerns and asked that the changes to the play street happen asap to minimise disruption during the Spring and Summer seasons. \n  \nEP addressed the general issue of children’s play and complaints from some residents about noise. In the longer term\, can residents be assured that LBH\, when marketing new flats\, will make it clear that they are situated on an estate with many families? \n  \nRG – new MUGA plans will start to be developed in the Spring. LBH are aware of how intensively the courtyards are used. There will be a management strategy in place for public realm as part of the planning application. \n  \nPC asked how the decommissioning of parking spaces will be managed. RG – some spaces have already been taken out of use. The process will be phased and LBH think there will be enough spaces for existing users. Regen. Team are working closely with the Parking team. RG and JS will hold surgeries to deal with queries and concerns with the proposed parking restrictions\, supplemented by Source drop ins (first Wednesday of every month). \n \n  \n  \n  \n  \nLW \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \n\n\n4.0\nFeedback from 2/12/25 exhibition – Joe Stancer\n \n\n\n4.1 \n  \n  \n  \n4.2 \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \nJS presented the outcomes of December’s consultations. The comments from the exhibition held on 2/12 were generally positive about the development and the survey on brick colours resulted in an overwhelming vote in favour of the lighter colour (57 in favour of the lighter brick\, 7 in favour of the current\, darker red colour). There was also an invitation to RSG to suggest ways to canvass views on the proposed Weston Court\, Green Lanes façade artwork. See attached slides. \n  \nEP asked about wider publicity for artwork ideas. Could the Youth Club be involved? KM suggested a history of the estate as a theme; she had been impressed by a mural at Regents Park Estate\, LB Camden that featured people who used to live there. CP noted the work that went into the history project and the photography project 10 years ago. \n  \nPC thought the model at the exhibition was very helpful to help residents understand the phase 3&4 plans. \n  \nCS asked how the outcomes from the exhibition are to be communicated\, noting that residents have expressed frustration in the past at being consulted but then not finding out the outcomes of that consultation. \n  \nIt was agreed that feedback should be produced before news of the outcome of the planning application. In order to do this more quickly\, LW offered Mulalley to produce the publicity from material written by LBH.\n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nLBH/Mulalley\n\n\n5.0\nSocial Value\n \n\n\n5.1\nCS observed that residents were unsure about how they can influence social value contributions. \n  \nLW – Christina Byrne\, Social Value Manager at Mulalley has been in touch with KM re some funding for allotments and will be making further contact soon to scope out what Mulalley can offer. CS – can she come to the March RSG? LW to check her availability over the next 2 months to get KC social value engagement moving. \n  \nLW reminded the meeting that Mulalley have one fund to spread across the 3 projects it is working on in Hackney at the moment\, although KC is the largest. There will be significantly more money available once formally in contract and on site. Mulalley currently fund the local food bank. The meeting called for Mulalley to publicise more what it is funding; LW to co-ordinate this information for the RSG. As before\, LW suggested that residents draw up a ‘shopping list’ of needs for Mulalley to use to target its funding. EP made the point that similar exercises have taken place in the past and she would feel reluctant to ask everyone again to elicit the same information. \n  \nGetting residents involved in these kinds of exercises has proved difficult. KM suggested setting up a stall outside Hackney Showroom to gather views. LW warned of managing expectations. \n \n  \n  \n  \nLW \n  \n  \n  \nLW \n  \n  \n  \n \n\n\n6.0\nITLA update\, RSG terms of reference – Source\n \n\n\n6.1\nCS expressed It was noted that there were more apologies from residents than attended. Our summary paper (attached) indicates that general motivations for being an RSG member and attending meetings was to receive updated information and to be kept informed. Source can offer induction training/workships for residents interested in becoming RSG members. It was agreed that Source will target publicity/invitations to unrepresented blocks (e.g. social housing blocks at the west end of Murrain Road). \n  \nResidents at this meeting all agreed that they found the meetings very useful\, otherwise they would not know what’s going on. JM suggested that now that Mulalley updates with clear presentations are a key part of the agenda\, residents might find attending meetings more informative. \n  \nIt was agreed that an open event in the summer to mark the completion of the planning process would be organised to attract and inform residents. \n  \nCS reminded the meeting that Source will continue its drop ins every first Wednesday of each month. Timings to be reviewed\, to 4.30 to 6.30 or 5.00 to 7.00\, subject to the availability of HS space. \n \n  \n  \n  \nSource  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nSource\, LBH\, Mulalley\n\n\n7.0 \nAOB\n \n\n\n7.1\ni) PD reported that the run off from jet-washed wheels of construction vehicles could be causing drain blockages. LW to raise this with the relevant team\, look at fitting silt filters to drains and carry out a drain survey. Mulalley have permission from Thames Water to deal with drain blockages now. \n  \nii) PD also raised the issue of the slope around the new DZ6S hoardings that could become very muddy and difficult to navigate when access to the bus stop on Green Lanes is restricted by the hoarding. LW to check this on site. \n  \niii) MS reported that most questions she receives are around start on site dates. LW could not provide a definite date as the time the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) may take to provide approval is unknown. But the aspiration is still to start on site towards the end of 2026/start of 2027. \n  \nKM asked how long it may take to mobilise for a start on site once  BSR approval is received. LW – not long but contracts with sub contractors and final procurements will need to completed after approvals\, which could take approx. 2 months. \n  \niv) EP asked why the lights on hoardings had to be so bright and why some are pink\, some white. LW will check with relevant team; some may still be waiting for shrouds to be fitted. Also to check colours! \n  \nv) EP also noted that leaseholders’ estate lighting bills have increased by approx. £400 p.a. Are Mulalley using estate lighting that is paid for by owners? LW confirmed not. \n \n  \nLW \n  \n  \n  \nLW \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nLW\n\n\n8.0\nDate of next meeting \nTuesday 17/3/26 at 7pm\n \n\n\n\n  \n 
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/kc-rsg-20-jan-2026/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:steering group meeting
ORGANIZER;CN="Source Partnership":MAILTO:john@sourcepartnership.com; carol@sourcepartnership.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260122T193000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260122T203000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20260119T195224Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260119T195224Z
UID:3248-1769110200-1769113800@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:Resident Meeting 22 Jan 7.30pm
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/resident-meeting-22-jan-7-30pm/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:residents group meeting
ORGANIZER;CN="KC TRA Committee":MAILTO:kingscrescentn4@gmail.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260314T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260314T220000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20260119T193613Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260314T153759Z
UID:3245-1773496800-1773525600@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:Miscarriage awareness charity event
DESCRIPTION:  \n \n  \nhttps://my-my-dreams.sumupstore.com/product/miscarriage-awareness-sponsored-walk-and-event 
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/miscarriage-awareness-charity-event/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:Charity Event
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260317T190000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260317T203000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20260407T214542Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260407T214542Z
UID:3258-1773774000-1773779400@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:KC RSG 17 March 2026
DESCRIPTION:Notes of Kings Crescent Steering Group Meeting held on 17th March 2026  \n  \n  \n\n\n\nPresent:\nCllr Clare Potter (CP) (Chair) \nResidents: \nRB\, JWM\, GG\, ES\, KM\, EP\, PD\, EV\, KH \n  \n \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \n\n\nIn Attendance:\nRon Greenwood (RG) \nJoe Stancer (JS) \nCarol Squires (CS) \nJohn Morris (JM) (minutes) \nLee Walsh (LW) \nChristina Byrne (CB) \n \nLB Hackney \nLB Hackney \nSource Partnership (ITLA) \nSource Partnership (ITLA) \nMulalley \nMulalley \n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n1.0\nIntroductions and apologies \nAction\n\n\n \nApologies were received from Alfred Fiorentini\, Paul Cushion\, Menekse Saitoglu\n  \n \n\n\n2.0\nNotes of previous meeting held 20th January 2026 and any Matters Arising not elsewhere on the agenda\n \n\n\n2.1 \n \nActions from last minutes: \n·       Discussions on play facilities ongoing between Mulalley\, HHB\, LBH \n·       Footpath has been redirected by Datchworth Court following discussions around DZ6S hoarding \n·       Feedback from last year’s exhibitions has been incorporated in the Statement of Community Involvement in planning application. \n·       Invitation for CB to attend this meeting made and she is here \n·       Source drop ins continuing starting at 4.30 now \n·       Construction vehicle mud-washing run off now being filtered and Mulalley have an agreement with Thames Water to drain straight into mains \n  \nEP raised the issue of lights on the hoardings that were discussed at the last meeting. Some are still very bright and shine into flat windows. LW -highway regulations mean that there needs to be white lights illuminating footpaths\, red lights on roadways and a certain lux level maintained. RB – lights shine into her bedroom in Theobalds Ct. KH – Casbeard St seems dark. LW to investigate lighting on Casbeard St.\n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nLW\n\n\n3.0\nProject update – Lee Walsh & Ron Greenwood\n \n\n\n3.1 \n  \n  \n  \n3.2 \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \nThere is not much new to report from the last meeting. Ground investigations continue; many obstructions\, e.g. under the DZ6S site and an old plant room from the towers under Casbeard St. and unregistered services uncovered. Mulalley are undertaking a mapping of the entire estate\, which takes time. The water table is high as a result of the wet winter and ground conditions are poor across the whole estate. Concrete that has been unearthed is stockpiled to test if it is contaminated and if it isn’t to be re-purposed. \n  \nQuestions/comments \n  \ni)        KH raised the issue of mosquitos that have been a major problem\, over summer months but also over the winter too. ES endorsed this\, stating that agencies (unknown?) have been investigating the infestation. Bob Miller (Project Manager) is aware of this and is ensuring that\, as far as possible\, there is no ponding or static water. JWM mentioned the constant high level of standing water in front of the old boiler room. Again\, Bob is aware of this and is striving to mitigate impact from this potential mosquito infestation. \n  \nii)       EV asked if more notice can be given when noisy works are planned. She recently tried to contact Joanna Kaye\, RLO when some loud excavations started and did not receive a response. LW accepted that messaging could be better and Malcolm Stephenson\, Senior Project Manager\, is working with LBH to agree more effective communications plan. JS confirmed that letters are being sent out to the flats worst affected by the ongoing works. ES asked what hours Mulalley are contracted to work within. LW – 8.00 am to 6.00 pm Mon-Fri and 8.00 am to 1.00 pm on Saturdays. In response to ES’s observation that some works went on until 8.00 pm.\, LW noted that UKPN are not covered by Mulalley’s agreed hours\, so this would have been their contractors. \n  \niii)     RG updated the meeting on progress with the planning application. This is due to be decided at a Planning Committee in late April. He asked the RSG if members would endorse a statement of support from the group\, read out by CP. \n  \nKH asked if the record of community consultation included the change of brick colour on some new blocks. RG confirmed that it did. \n  \nES suggested that the 4th bullet point in the list of aspirations: “A well managed and maintained neighbourhood where incidences of anti social behaviour are dealt with effectively\,” should be more accurately classified within a management area of responsibility and therefore not a design aspiration. It was agreed to omit this bullet point. \n  \nEV stated she wouldn’t be comfortable signing this statement. \n  \nKM stated that this was the first time she has seen this document. CS – this is a slightly amended version of a statement that was agreed to and signed by CP and a number of other members for the original planning application. KH suggested this was actually  less contentious than the original. \n  \nIt was agreed that an amended version of the statement would be circulated for members to have another week to comment. \n \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nSource  \n \n\n\n4.0\nIntroduction to Christina Byrne\, Social Value lead at Mulalley\n \n\n\n4.1 \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \nCB introduced herself and gave an overview of Mulalley’s interpretation of ‘social value.’ This is focused on skills\, work experience\, employment opportunities and\, sometimes directly and sometimes via local charities\, is presented via schools and colleges. Mulalley already run a work experience programme across Hackney for 16-24 year olds. Mulalley also use their supply chain to employ local labour. They also partner with Hackney Food bank to provide donations\, financial and in kind. RB has provided a list of ideas for projects with the TRA and young people\, including trips off the estate while there is no play area/MUGA. Views from young people have been garnered from doorknocking across the estate. \n  \nCB – are there any other suggestions from members? It is important to provide as wide a range of choices as possible across age ranges and the local demographic. But it is also important that initiatives funded by Mulalley Social Value Team do not replicate what LBH management should be providing (e.g. maintenance of open spaces). \n  \nKM suggested that the success of the allotment/gardening group could be built on by helping generate interest in wider planting opportunities across the estate. CB gave volunteer days from within Mulalley staff as an example of how support in kind can be provided. Hackney Foodbank also has volunteering opportunities. \n  \nCP suggested the elders group is a good contact for a different segment of the Kings Crescent population. RB raised the feeling from the doorknocking exercises that many KC-resident elders do not want to attend the Friday lunches in Hackney Showroom. HS are still delivering some lunches on the estate. HS also organise other activities\, e.g. over 60’s disco. \n  \nEP asked if Mulalley can generate a list of projects that have had success in the past to stimulate ideas that could work here. CP suggested this accompanies the list that LW showed the meeting of projects already funded. \n  \nLW noted the proposal for a celebration\, possibly a barbecue to mark the milestone of the new planning approval. This could take the place of the next scheduled RSG date. KH asked if there could be a digger available for children who are excited by construction vehicles. \n  \nEV noted that there is an appetite for residents to meet each other more. Estate-wide social events might help promote this. CS added that the Source drop ins are available for residents who do not want to attend formal meetings. \n  \nKM acknowledged that language issues sometimes prevent greater levels of involvement. Turkish-speaking parents often bring their children to interpret but many are now getting involved in the allotment group (now there are 69 allotment beds in the phase 1 courtyards with many new people involved). \n  \nMuch communication between residents at the moment is conducted via WhatsApp groups. KH – there are 127 members of the Leaseholders Action Group\, with 100+ communicating on whats app. He added that there is a sense of demoralisation amongst residents in the north side ‘new’ blocks\, particularly leaseholders who have experienced many issues with the management of the common areas\, in particular the lifts. RB is in the process of setting up an estate-wide whats app group through the TRA. \n \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nMulalley (CB?)\n\n\n5.0\nSource update \n \n\n\n5.1\nCS – drop ins still useful\, held on the first Wednesday of each month\, 4.30 to 6.30 in Hackney Showroom. The February drop in highlighted the appearance of the hoarding around the DZ6S site and the closure of the footpath. Credit is due to Mulalley for responding quickly to this. JS will attend the drop in on 1/4/26 to deal with queries\, concerns about the proposed temporary parking rearrangements. \n  \nSource can also be a conduit for social value ideas that residents might communicate to us. We have raised the opportunities presented by the proposals for artwork or an enlivening of the Weston Court Green Lanes façade. \n  \nFurther suggestions were raised for public displays: JWM – could we use the material that is available on the history of KC? Stories on hoardings? EV suggested that a better public mapping of the blocks would be welcomed.\n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \n \n\n\n6.0\nAOB\n \n\n\n6.1\nES sought clarification on the Weston Court Green Lanes elevation  proposal. RG – the proposals at the moment are that there would be artwork that is co-designed between residents and a professional artist. CB has an artist contact who has produced work in Finsbury Park. KH noted the well known mural in Dalston and KM the artwork at Regents Park Estate that features ex residents. She suggested trying out ideas on the hoardings that currently envelop the site.\n  \n  \n  \n \n\n\n6.2\nES asked if lessons are being learnt from the experience of residents in the phase 1&2 blocks in terms of design\, installation of services etc.? KH suggested that if LBH can confirm that the same issues will not affect the new blocks\, the fact that these issues have been acknowledged and efforts made to ensure they do not repeat\, might improve morale slightly amongst the current leaseholders. RG confirmed that LBH are of course very much aware of the issues with lifts etc. and will continue to learn lessons from phase 1&2 and strive to make sure these problems do not reoccur. \n \n \n\n\n7.0 \nDate of next meeting\n \n\n\n7.1\nIt was proposed that the June meeting would take the form of a wider community event. Current dates already occupied include 14/6 for a TRA family fun day and 11/7 for Hackney Showroom’s street party. Other suggestions included an early evening summer event\, potentially on a Friday. \n \n  \n  \n \n\n\n\n  \nKings Crescent Residents Steering Group \n  \n  \nMeeting to be held on  \nTuesday 17th March 2026 starting at 7.00pm  \nHackney Showroom \n  \n  \nAGENDA \n  \n\n\n\n1\nIntroductions and Apologies \n \nCllr Potter (Chair)  \n \n\n\n2\nMinutes from the last meeting 20th January and matters arising \n \nCllr Potter (Chair)\n\n\n3\nProject update & RSG support for planning application\nLee Walsh\, (Mulalley) \n \n\n\n4\nIntroduction to Social Value Manager Christina Byrne \n(Mulalley) and Discussion \n \nCllr Potter\n\n\n5 \nITLA Up-date\nCarol & John \n(Source Partnership) \n \n\n\n7\nAOB\nCllr Potter (Chair)  \n \n\n\n8\nDate of next meeting \nCllr Potter (Chair) \n \n\n\n\n  \n  \n 
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/kc-rsg-17-march-2026/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom\, Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2GD
CATEGORIES:steering group meeting
ORGANIZER;CN="Source Partnership":MAILTO:john@sourcepartnership.com; carol@sourcepartnership.com
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20260416T193000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20260416T210000
DTSTAMP:20260408T000000
CREATED:20260407T213459Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260407T213459Z
UID:3255-1776367800-1776373200@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:ETRA & Community Meeting 16 April 2026
DESCRIPTION:  \n  \nAgenda\n16 April 2026 7.30 – 9pm \n‘Enhanced’ Tenants & Residents Association & Community Meeting \n\n\n\n\n  \n\nAgenda Item\nSuggested \nTiming\nLead\n\n\n1\nWelcome\, Introductions & Apologies\n5 mins\nRemi (TRA Chair)\n\n\n \nMeeting will be attended by June Welcome our Housing Officer and possibly other Hackney staff \n·        Approval of minutes from last meetings \n-18.09.2025 was last ETRA meeting \n– 22.01.2026 was last community meeting\n \n \n\n\n2\nEstate Cleaning\n \n \n\n\n \n·        June to update on progress with standards of cleaning since last meeting\n5 mins\nJune Welcome \nHousing Officer               ? cleaning team\n\n\n3\nRepairs\n \n \n\n\n \n·        Lighting Theobalds Court \n·        Flooded area under old boiler room \n·        Broken courtyard gates \n·        How can residents be kept updated on progress of repairs \n·        Who supervises to ensure repairs are carried out effectively given the repeated nature of raised issues\n10 mins\nJune Welcome \nHousing Officer \n? someone from repairs team \n \n\n\n4\nLift Issues\n \n \n\n\n \n·        Updates since last meeting \n·        High costs of repairs ? value for money \n \n5 mins\nKarsten Hartmann (resident) to send update\n\n\n5\nOther Issues Raised by Residents\n \n \n\n\n \n\n\nMonthly inspections update\nBike store update\n\n\n10 mins\nJune Welcome \nHousing Officer\n\n\n6\nCommunity Update\n \n \n\n\n \n·        Funding update \n·        Gardening update \n·        Youth update\n30 mins\nTRA committee members\n\n\n7\nAny other business? \n \n5 mins\nRemi (TRA Chair)\n\n\n8\nDates of next meetings & close \n \n5 mins\nRemi (TRA Chair)
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/etra-community-meeting-16-april-2026/
LOCATION:Hackney Showroom Space\, 4 Murrain Road\, London\, N4 2BN\, United Kingdom
CATEGORIES:ETRA meeting
ORGANIZER;CN="KC TRA Committee":MAILTO:kingscrescentn4@gmail.com
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR