BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Kings Crescent - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://kingscrescent.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Kings Crescent
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20180325T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20181028T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20190331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20191027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20190509T183000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20190509T193000
DTSTAMP:20260511T211416
CREATED:20190418T210729Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20190516T175654Z
UID:599-1557426600-1557430200@kingscrescent.org
SUMMARY:Service Charges Meeting
DESCRIPTION:The Kings Crescent Resident’s committee are aware that some residents have concerns regarding their service charges. We have invited the New Build team and Hackney leasehold team to an open meeting to give residents an overview of service changes and the service charge process. \nAll residents from old and new blocks are invited to attend if you wish to understand more about service charges. \nPlease be aware that it will not be possible to discuss individual issues at this meeting\, but they can be phones or emailed through to the Leasehold/New Build team. \nNotes taken at meeting by Alice H (Residents committee secretary) \nMeeting: Thursday 9th May\, 6:30pm-8pm.\n\n\n\nChaired by John from Source PartnershipAttendees from Council\nCharmaine Dennis\, new build team.\nJohn \, new build property manager\nChris service charge manager for the older blocks and new blocks\nSamantha Jensen\, calculating service charges.\n\n\nQueries about particular situation can be passed on via:\nNew build: newbuild@hackney.gov.uk\nOlder estate\, service.charges@hackney.gov.uk\n\nTwo service charge statements each year: one estimated\, and one actual.\nActual 2018/2019 in September 2020\nEstimated 2019/2020 in March/April 2019\nThere is a one year lag in estimated vs actual.\n\nBy law required to include costs in the service charges within 18 months of when they are incurred.\n\nAn overview was given as to how estimated and actual costs are calculated:\n\nEstimated\n\nBudgeted costs are sourced from key parties where available (eg. cleaning companies)\nOther costs\, such as maintenance. These will be based on average over last 2\, 4\, or 5 years – the length of time will be chosen based o which time  period is seen to be most representative.\n\nActual service charge is calculated: \n\n\nActual cost of providing service. This is the actual costs incurred.\nTake actual cost information from different areas and review for appropriateness\nApportionment for block and estate is the same for actual and estimated\nCosts are allocated to flats based on number of bedrooms\nBuilding insurance is usually same expected vs actual\n\n\n\n\nA further breakdown of actual service  charge costs can be requested within 6 months of the service charge request. Therefore\, please request if you would like in Autumn when you get the service charge statement.\nAll invoices can be viewed\, though there is a £10 charge (and you should expect several arch lever files of invoices)\nExpected to get right (within c.100£) about 80% of time\nAcross Hackney\, in many cases\, credits are given back to residents at end of year\,\nThe approach to “large costs” (known as major works) is different between phase 1 and phase 2. Phase 1 (older blocks) pay for large costs when incurred\, and payment options are provided. Phase 2 (newer blocks) operate a reserve fund where contributions are made each year and large costs will come out of the reserve fund\, this aims to spread costs across all residents fairly.\nTo calculate the contribution to the reserve fund\,  the expected cost of replacement of key items (eg. roof) and expected lifespan are used to estimate the amount of reserve fund needed. The annual contribution per residents is then calculated.\nbank interest on the  reserve fund is kept in the reserve fund. Level of funds in the reserve fund is reviewed once every 5 years.\nManagement charge\, details are given in he service charge booklet. The management charge amount is the cost of providing management services. However\, this is also bench-marked against management charges charged by other councils. Generally not all management costs are recharged because the cost would be too high to expect residents to pay.\n\n\nSeveral Questions were asked and a collation of the key points made is below:\n\nEstate cleaning is split across all residents. Block cleaning is split by block. There is no cross-subsidy.\na similar principle applies for CCTV.\nThere was some discussion on CCTV and in particular\, some residents wanted confirmation that the CCTV does work in their blocks. Charmaine confirmed that all new blocks have operational CCTV cameras. An action was taken away by Hackney to confirm whether CCTV works is in some of the phase 1 blocks.  When CCTV is not working\, costs are not charged.\nA comment was made from some residents living in phase 1 blocks that cleaning is sometimes done very poorly. Charmaine agreed to follow-up with those residents specifically.\nThe point was made that ASB can be observed across the estate.\nQuestions were asked around whether reserve fund approach is fair.\nthere was a question around whether the phase 3 construction company will contribute to cleaning costs as a result of the building work. The exact details can only be known when the construction company is chosen but Hackney confirmed that this could be a point taken under consideration when choosing the company who will build phase III. it would be usual for some additional cleaning to be paid for by the company overseeing the building work.\nIt was noted that it is more difficult to estimate costs for the new block as there are more unknowns. however\, it is to be expected that this would become more stable overtime.\nA question was asked as to whether when errors are made by staff\, are additional service charges taken from residents to cover additional costs. In terms of staff costs\, the answer was no\, there are no additional costs. However\,  i do plan to ask a follow-up question on this.\nA question was asked about how Hackney ensured value for money for residents.\n\n\nthe following examples were also given:\n\nCleaning ensuring value for money by checking that the cleaning being carried out is what is expected:\n\nHave a schedule for cleaning across the estate\nManagers do complete quality checks\nPilot scheme ongoing to have a check- in system where cleaners “check-in” on an app to show the time spent cleaning the different areas.\n\n\n\n\n\n10% of all repairs are inspected to ensure they have been done correctly.\n\n\n\na question was asked about the error in the heating/hot water bill that has recently been corrected. This error happened because an admin error was made in terms of allocating the cost of the heating/hot water contract. There are several checks and controls around service charges\, including a review by the legal team. Unfortunately\, this got missed. Additional controls have been added to reduce the likelihood of this happening again.\nVolunteers from the estate are shown service charge costs in advance to review and give feedback in advance of being shared with all residents. Charmaine asked for volunteers\, several new people volunteered (including a member of the residents committee).\nSolar panels pay for electricity for lifts and lighting. So block electricity costs include a reduction due to electricity sourced from solar panels.\n\n\nElectricity is bulk brought at lower costs than residents would be likely to get privately.\n\n\nthe comment was made that the additional letter sent with the corrected service charges\, was a good start and a move in the right direction. However\, it was confusing in places. Residents offered to input into this\, and there may be opportunity to do this via the volunteers who review the service charges in advance. However\, there wasn’t total clarity or agreement on this\n\nThere was a comment made that residents feel that\, on occasional\, Hackney does not listen sufficiently to residents feedback and/or reporting of issues around the estate. It can therefore take a very long time before action is taken. The request was made as to why Hackney cannot make the most of the residents who are often very knowledgeable about issues on the estate. One example would be that there have been frequent reports of CCTV cameras being missing or non-operational. Rather than acting directly on residents’ reports\, a time consuming process of reviewing was carried out and there are still thought to be issues with cameras in some blocks.\nit was requested whether residents in phase II could be told the total amount in the reserve fund.\nMajor works and repairs will be covered by the tenants in that block where the repairs or major works are carried out. Costs are shared fairly across all flats in the relevant block.\n\nBased a 1-1 conversation after the meeting: As a note to residents in Chipping Court\, you should have seen a change in the service charge costs for lifts. If you have not\, please contact Hackney.
URL:https://kingscrescent.org/calendar/service-charges-meeting/
LOCATION:Vince Murrrain Community Centre\, N4 2GD
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR